SA Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on International Relations and Co-operation Visit to Israel, Palestine & Gaza

Saturday 30th March 2013
Cheryllyn Dudley MP

At OR Tambo Int Airport - flying Ethiopian Airways to Addis Ababa then on to Tel Aviv (arriving at 2am) then on to Ramallah by vehicle to start meetings with the Palestinian Authorities a few hours later. An outline of our itinerary is below.

I am Proud of our International Relations committee - although, in the main, they are seriously biased against Israel as they blindly defend the Palestinian cause - they have kept the promise they made well over a year ago (against all odds and the opportunity to make many excuses) to visit Israel Palestine and Gaza giving equal time and attention to issues and concerns on all fronts. This was in response to a recommendation from the ACDP that the Resolution they intended to submit to the National Assembly - after visiting Gaza alone - stand over until the committee visits all sectors to ensure a more credible report and hopefully less biased resolutions. Even the Committee Researcher played a key role in keeping the committee on track.


ITINERARY 

SUNDAY 31 MARCH

Arrive: Ben Gurion International Airport (2.40am) – depart for Ramallah

Programme: PALESTINE & GAZA

Meeting - Prime Minister -Dr. Salam Fayyad
Meeting - H.E. Minister of Foreign Affairs Dr. Riad Malki
Meeting - H.E. President Mahmoud Abbas
Meeting - Dr.Saeb Erikat, Palestine’s Chief Negotiator - Israel-Palestine Peace Process
Meeting - Jamal Juma
Meeting - FATAH/PLO International Relations Commission Dr. Nabil Shaath
Working dinner - FATAH/PLO International Relations Commission - Dr. Nabeel Shaath

MONDAY 1 April

Meeting - Dr Aziz Dweik, Speaker of Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC)
Political Tour coordinated by Negotiations Affairs Department
Briefing by Dr. Mahdi, PASSIA

TUESDAY 2 April

Travel to Gaza
Meeting - HAMAS Foreign Min/ Prime Minister, Ismail Hanniyeh & Deputy Foreign Min, Dr. Ghazi Hamad,
Meeting - Dr Zakariyah Al Agha, Member of Executive Committee/ Head of FATAH Forum/Head of Refugees Committee
      Meeting - Dr Mahmoud Ajrami,
President of Academy for Post Graduate Studies in Diplomacy & Politics
Travel to Jerusalem
Briefing - H.E. Ambassador Sisa Ngombane (Dinner -SA Embassy Tel Aviv)
                                   
WEDNESDAY 3 APRIL

Tour of Jerusalem - Adv Daniel Seideman, President of Terrestrial Jerusalem – “Impact of settlements on the future of Jerusalem in Two State”
                                                         
Terrestrial Jerusalem (TJ) is an Israeli non-profit organisation devoted to the illumination of Israeli-Palestinian relations in Jerusalem. TJ delivers prominent information & analyses towards upgrading the quality of the decision-making processes relating to Jerusalem, its current management and its future political status.

Visit to the HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL
                                 
Round Table discussion – Mossawa (coalition against racism - status of Arab Israeli Citizens

Round Table Luncheon – discussion with B’tselem (Breaking the Silence) & ACRI (Assoc for Civil Rights in Israel)

B’tselem - The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories was established in 1989 by a group of prominent academics, attorneys, journalists, and Knesset members. It endeavors to document and educate the Israeli public and policymakers about human rights violations in the Occupied Territories, combat the phenomenon of denial prevalent among the Israeli public, and help create a human rights culture in Israel.

Breaking the Silence is an organization of veteran Israeli combatants who have served in the Israeli military since the start of the Second Intifada and have taken it upon themselves to expose the Israeli public to the reality of everyday life in the Occupied Territories. Breaking the Silence endeavours to stimulate public debate about the price paid for a reality in which young soldiers face a civilian population on a daily basis, and are engaged in the control of that population’s everyday life.

The Association of Civil Rights In Israel (ACRI) – ACRI was established in 1972, ACRI is Israel’s oldest and largest human rights organization and the only one dealing with the entire spectrum of rights and civil liberties issues in Israel and the Occupied Territories. An independent and non-partisan organization, ACRI’s mandate is to ensure Israel’s accountability and respect for human rights, by addressing violations committed by the Israeli authorities in Israel, the Occupied Territories, or elsewhere. ACRI is committed to promoting the universality of human rights and defending the human rights and civil liberties of all, regardless of religion, nationality, gender, ethnicity, political affiliation, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic background.
 
Meeting - Gen Yaakov Amidror, Nat Security Advisor/Head of Israeli Nat Security Council
                                 
Dinner - Israeli Ministry Foreign Affairs - Ambassador Avraham Granot, Dept Dir Gen Africa

THURSDAY, 04 APRIL

Meeting - NGO Peace Forum - Mr Ron Pundak & Ambassador Ilan Baruch

Peace Forum is a formal structure promoting the on-going cooperation and interaction between active Palestinian and Israeli Peace NGOs. Forum members work together to influence decision making and public opinion, support the peace process and reconciliation efforts by mobilizing civil society and greater populations of the region.

Round table discussion (Q & A) – Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Meeting - Mr Yair Lapid, leader of Yesh Atid & Minister of Finance

Meeting – Ms Tzipi Livni, leader of Hatnuah & Minister of Justice              

FRIDAY, 05 APRIL 2013

Depart 01H10 from Ben Gurion International Airport for Jhb  via Addis Ababa

Kagiso - ex UCDP Youth League Leader - joins the ACDP

Media statement by Kagiso Monyadiwa 
=============================

I have been doing a thorough introspection about my future in politics in as far as changing fellow citizens lives is concerned. As an individual who believe in his leadership skills,qualities and credential my displaced political efforts at the UCDP has become a huge concern not only to myself but also to those who believe in my capabilities and capacity.

It is to everyone's attention that the UCDP will never regain it's position in the political spectrum of this country. The infighting that sees the attention and all resources channelled to court battles even if the 2014 General elections are around the corner sees the party failing to secure the maximum support in the North West Province and it is evident that UCDP has reached a ceiling in growth thanks to the power-struggle going on at the moment.

I therefore interprete joining ACDP as an opportunity for me in as far as ensuring there's an improvement in fellow South Africans lives and addressing of moral issues in this country is concerned.

I'm not a 'positionist'. I'm voluntarily joining ACDP not having been promised anything in return.

Let me thank the UCDP for affording me a chance to lead the UCDP Youth League, that has truly been an eye-opener as I've learnt a lot in my spell as the Youth League President.

Goodluck to them for the future

A LEKOKO LE GOLE!!!

Statement by:
Kagiso Josiah Monyadiwa
073 678 4743
monyadiwak@webmail.co.za

Changing Political Landscape - FCOP Presentation

16 March 2013
Cheryllyn Dudley MP ACDP

2009 National Election

• ANC split/COPE formed
• ANC held their ground
• Opposition voters broke with tradition
• Electorate  sent clear message - one opposition!
• Many ACDP voters voted: biggest opposition – for some it was DA others thought it would be COPE
• National & Local election reduced to:
• voting for or against ANC – issues not important!

ACDP - Two options:

• Prophetic Voice - ‘Saying what God says’ – votes secondary
• To be the Government – votes necessary!

Work of the Pastor

vs

Work of Government

• Must have both to keep the tension of justice in human society.
• both have authority from God - different authority for different functions
• one must have will of the people behind it
• other must have will of God
• one reveals standard of the people
• other reveals Gods standard
• one must represent/please people
• other must represent God alone
• both may seek to convince the people

Working for highest level of justice possible - upholding existing rights!
• Individual, women, workers, immigrants, nations, communities, parent’s, children, spouses, property, prisoners, victims, the poor, tribal, animal, protest, religious, sexual, free speech, work, live, reputation, to know and more...
• all present and defended in the scripture

Imperfect world...

no perfect solution!

We reveal God in

what we hold in

tension not in

Perfect findings...

Our goal is to: 
• move towards God’s Values & Rightful Authority
• Restoring His thinking in our lives, families, communities

“Called into civil governance for the Glory of God & good of the people. Not to perfect the world or nation  but to offer God’s perspective - a better way & to allow society a choice”.  Landa Cope

The ACDP:
'transitioning' from a 'church' party to a serious 'political' party
standing for:
a 'shared future' in South Africa
a caring Christian Democratic Party -
aspiring to bring stability, prosperity & hope
valuing unity & diversity - committed to freedom of religion & family values
offers leadership of trust & integrity - passionate about addressing needs of all the people in South Africa.
2014 National Election
ANC
DA/ID/COPE/IFP/UDM/FF+
ACDP/UCDP
AZAPO/APC/PAC

Umbrella Body: Opposition Parties - FCOP Presentation

16 March 2013
Cheryllyn Dudley MP - ACDP

Opposition party leaders started meeting early 2012
Objective: to explore possible co-operation on issues.
Successful rallies followed

Increased cooperation:
- Opposing Protection of State information Bill
- Motion of no confidence in the President.

Why would ACDP commit to opposition party co-operation?

• a demonstration by opposition parties of commitment to forming coalition government when ANC get less than 50% of vote.
• Gives SA strong alternative without requiring parties to compromise
• Voters can still vote for party that represents them
• Will bring party specific perspective to the table in a governing coalition

Israel: recent elections
• Electorate took vote from strongest coalition partner
• Strengthened smaller parties to bring balance & broader perspective in coalition decisions

DA & COPE would like to see parties working as one at the next election BUT
• open to ACDP remaining in co-operation rather than coalition

Election Campaign:

“a vote for any co-operating opposition parties is a vote for a responsible coalition government“
NB – a far cry from “a vote for a smaller party is a wasted vote”!

• Opposition party co-operation & coalition government:
• Pros & cons for ACDP to be carefully considered

Briefing on the Zimbabwe Constitutional Referendum

BRIEFING ON THE ZIMBABWE CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENDUM

Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on International Relations and Cooperation

Deputy Minister Ebrahim

20 March 2013

INTRODUCTION

This briefing will focus on the Zimbabwe Constitutional Referendum which was held on 16 March 2013. 

In keeping with Article 6 of the Global Political Agreement (GPA) and Articles 3 and 4 of the Referendum Act and Electoral Act, Zimbabwe conducted a Constitutional Referendum on  Saturday, 16 March 2013.

The holding of the Constitutional Referendum is one of the three milestones in the implementation of the GPA, namely formation of the Inclusive Government, Constitutional Referendum and the harmonised elections.

Most importantly, the holding of the Constitutional Referendum paves the way for the holding of the forthcoming harmonised elections.

Harmonised elections are expected to be held between July and October 2013.

REFERENDUM

•          South Africa formed part of the SADC Election Observer Mission (SEOM) which was deployed in Zimbabwe among other Observer Missions.

•          The SADC Mission deployed in total seventy-eight observers covering all nine provinces.

•          According to the statement of the SADC Mission, polling was conducted procedurally and procedures for secure counting of votes were adhered to.

•          All Observers in their reports indicated that the Referendum was largely tolerant, transparent and smooth.

•          The SADC Mission concluded that the Constitutional Referendum was peaceful and credible.

•          In terms of the Regulations, the results of the Referendum must be announced no later than five days after the close of polling, meaning they should be announced on or before Thursday, 21 March 2013

•          It generally expected that a “Yes” vote will prevail because the three main political parties had agreed on the draft and had campaigned for a “yes” vote.

•          Other political parties that are not party to the GPA including ZAPU, also campaigned for a “yes” vote.

•          One small political party and an NGO called National Constitutional Assembly campaigned for a “no” vote. 

WAY FORWARD

•          When the results of the Referendum are announced and the results confirm that the Draft Constitution has been adopted by the electorate, the Minister of Parliamentary and Constitutional Affairs will take the draft Constitution to Parliament and introduce a Constitution Bill.

•           After the Bill is endorsed by Parliament, it will then be sent to the President for his assent.

•          Once the President has assented, the Bill will become law upon gazetting. Thereafter the country will be expected to finalise preparations for elections.

CONCLUSION

•          In keeping with the SADC mandate, the Facilitator (President Zuma) and the Facilitation Team will  continue to assist the people of Zimbabwe to prepare for the holding of credible and peaceful harmonised elections.

•          Considering our obligation in terms of the GPA, SADC remains seized with the question of Zimbabwe.

Human Rights Situation in Western Sahara - Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on International Relations and Cooperation

Deputy Minister Ebrahim
20 MARCH 2013


Outline of the presentation
• Brief background
• Human rights situation in Western Sahara
• South Africa’s foreign policy on Western Sahara
• Observations
• Way forward

Brief Background
• Western Sahara has since 1976 been occupied by the Kingdom of Morocco.
• Neither the United Nations (UN) nor the African Union (AU) recognises Morocco’s claims of sovereignty over the Western Sahara.
• The Moroccan claim, that the Western Sahara (in the pre-colonial period) was part of the historic Moroccan Kingdom was rejected by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in its Advisory Opinion of 16 October 1975.
• The legal status of Western Sahara in the 4th Committee of United Nations General assembly (UNGA) is clear, it is a non-self-governing territory awaiting decolonisation through a referendum on self-determination.

Human Situation in Western Sahara
• The situation in the Western Sahara occupied territories  continues to deteriorate due to the delay in resolving the dispute.
• The human rights violations are characterised by the disappearance of Saharawi human rights activists, the torture of prisoners of conscience, arbitrary detention, police brutality, intimidation and extrajudicial executions.
• The violation of the rights to freedom of expression, freedom of assembly and freedom of association of Saharawis continue to be suppressed in the Western Sahara occupied territories.
• Furthermore a media blackout imposed by Morocco in the occupied territories continues to deprive the international community from being exposed to the rampant human rights violations committed against the Saharawis.
• The absence of a human rights component in the mandate of the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) has exacerbated the dire human rights situation in the occupied territories.
• The Robert F. Kennedy Centre visited occupied territories and the Saharawi refugee camps in Tindouf, Algeria in 2012. The following findings were reported:
• In the Western Sahara occupied territories the delegation experienced firsthand the brutalities committed by Moroccan security forces against the Saharawi people;
• The delegation was also subjected to intimidation and harassment by the Moroccan security forces which obstructed their ability to work;
• There is a pattern of violence against the Saharawi people who openly advocate the independence of Western Sahara; and
• The Saharawi human rights defenders are prohibited from registering as civil society organizations

Report by the Special Representative of the UNSG for Western Sahara to the UNSC
• The Special Representative of the UNSG for Western Sahara, Amb. Christopher Ross’ report to the Security Council on 28 November 2012 on the situation in the Western Sahara occupied territories noted the following:
• There is continuous police repression of the Saharawi people living in the occupied territories;
• The Saharawi people do not benefit from the natural resources that are illegally exploited in Western Sahara, considered to be a non-self governing territory by the UN; and
• None of the security forces in Western Sahara are Saharawis, but are instead from Morocco.

The UNSG Annual Report on Western Sahara
• The UNSG Mr Ban Ki-Moon presented the Annual Report on the situation in Western Sahara to the Security Council in April 2012.
• The UNSG noted the following and raised concerns about the human rights violations in the Western Sahara by Moroccan authorities:
• Highlighted that many Saharawi people are currently facing trial before the Permanent Military Tribunal of the Royal Armed Forces in Rabat;
• Noted that the use of military or special courts to try civilians raises serious problems as far as the equitable, impartial and independent administration of justice is concerned; and
• Emphasised that every individual should be tried by ordinary courts or tribunals using established legal procedures in accordance with international human rights instruments.

Sentencing of the 25 Saharawi Human Rights Activists
• On 17 February 2013, 25 Saharawi human rights activists were sentenced by a Moroccan military court.
• They were detained since 2010 for setting up a protest camp in the Western Sahara town of Gdeim Izik against Morocco’s repression of the Saharawi people.
• The sentences given to these activists range from two years to life imprisonment.
• According to international law, a Moroccan military court does not have the jurisdiction to prosecute acts and events taking place in Western Sahara
• Several international bodies issued statements condemning the sentencing, among them, Amnesty International and the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights (ACHPR);
• On 04 March 2013 South Africa issued a statement condemning the sentencing of the 25 Saharawi human rights activists;
• South Africa also urged Morocco to release all political and prisoners of conscience as a means to begin meaningful negotiations with the POLISARIO Front.
South Africa’s Foreign Policy on Western Sahara: A matter of principle
• The right to self-determination was the basis upon which the democratic South Africa (SA) was founded.
• Contradiction of this sacred principle vis-a-vis the issue of Western Sahara would constitute a betrayal of its painful struggle and commitment to respect the Charter of the UN and the Constitutive act of the AU.
• SA supports the ongoing UN efforts aimed at achieving a just, lasting and mutually acceptable political solution, which will provide for the self-determination  of the people of Western Sahara.

South Africa’s support for the self-determination of Western Sahara is based on the following principles:
• The principles of multilateralism and international legality in seeking a just, lasting and mutually acceptable political solution, which will provide for the self-determination of the people of Western Sahara;
• The centrality of the African Union and United Nations in the resolution of the conflict;
• The Constitutive Act of the African Union, in particular the principle of the sanctity of inherited colonial borders in Africa and the right of peoples of former colonial territories to self-determination and independence;
• Respect of international human rights law in the occupied territories, notable the right to freedom of association, assembly, movement and expression;
• Respect of international humanitarian law and support for the provision of humanitarian assistance to the Saharawi refugees in a way that is predictable, sustainable and timely;
• An end to the illegal exploration and exploitation of the natural resources of Western Sahara in the illegally occupied territory and the discouragement of the involvement of foreign companies in such activities; and
• Support for the integration and stability of the Arab Maghreb Union as a building block of the African Union.

Observations
• The sentencing of the 25 human rights activists serves as a confirmation that the non-resolution of the Western Sahara conflict perpetuates the extension of the suffering of the Saharawi people who continue to live under difficult circumstances in the occupied territories;
• The presence of Morocco in the UNSC has stifled attempts aimed at including a human rights component in MINURSO; and
• South Africa’s representative at the UN has continued to reiterate the need for UN Resolutions to be implemented and the right of self-determination of the Western Sahara to be respected.

Way Forward
• There is a need for intensified efforts by the allies of the Saharawi Arab Democratic Republic i.e SA, Algeria, Angola and Nigeria, etc., aimed at exerting pressure on Morocco to comply with international law and UN Resolutions;
• The African Union should have greater participation in the negotiations between the POLISARIO Front and Morocco;
• The mandate of MINURSO should be expanded to incorporate a human rights monitoring mechanism
• The United Nations should urgently expedite the resolution of the issue of Western Sahara, by taking all the necessary measures for the organization of a referendum for self-determination of the people of Western Sahara in accordance with the relevant African Union decisions and United Nations Resolutions.

SADC Election Observation Mission To The Replublic of Zimbabwe Statement

SADC ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION

TO THE REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE

STATEMENT

BY

HON. BERNARD KAMILLIUS MEMBE

MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION OF THE

UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

AND

HEAD OF THE SADC ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION

TO THE

CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENDUM IN THE REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE

HELD

ON 16 MARCH 2013

The Zimbabwe Electoral Commission(ZEC);
Esteemed Leaders of the  Political Parties;
The Select Committee of Parliament on the New Constitution(COPAC);
Honourable Ministers;
Honourable Members of Parliament;
The Executive Secretary of SADC;
Members of the SADC Electoral Advisory Council;
The SADC Facilitation Team;
Members of the Diplomatic Corps;
Religious Leaders;
Members of Civil Society;
Esteemed Members of various Election Observation Missions;
Esteemed Members of the Media;
Distinguished Guests;
Ladies and Gentlemen


It is indeed an honour and pleasure to welcome you all to this important event, the presentation of the SADC Election Observation Mission (SEOM) Statement on the Constitutional Referendum in the Republic of Zimbabwe.

INTRODUCTION
SADC being one the Guarantors of the Global Political Agreement (GPA) has noted with appreciation the implementation of Article 6 of the GPA which outlines the processes and timeframes leading to the holding of the Referendum.

It is against this backdrop and in accordance with the SADC Principles and Guidelines Governing Democratic Elections that the Southern African Development Community (SADC) was invited by the Government of the Republic of Zimbabwe to observe the Referendum held on 16 March 2013.

In light of the above, the Chairperson of the SADC Organ on Politics, Defence and Security Cooperation, His Excellency Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete, President of the United Republic of Tanzania, officially constituted the SEOM to the Republic of Zimbabwe and mandated the SADC Executive Secretary, Dr.Tomáz Salamão to facilitate the administrative and logistical support for the Mission.

The Chairperson of the SADC Organ on Politics, Defence and Security Cooperation appointed me, Bernard Kamillius Membe, Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of the United Republic of Tanzania, to head the Mission.

The SEOM was officially launched in Harare, Zimbabwe,on 10 March 2013.

After days of intensive work, the SEOM has the honour to deliver its statement on the outcome of its observation of the Constitutional Referendum in Zimbabwe.



THE ROLE OF THE SADC REFERENDUM OBSERVATION MISSION



The Mission derives its mandate from the SADC Principles and Guidelines Governing Democratic Elections, which emanate from the African Union (AU) Declaration on the Principles Governing Democratic Elections in Africa and the AU Guidelines for African Union Election Observation and Monitoring Missions.The Mission also worked within the legal framework of the Republic of Zimbabwe.

In developing the nature and scope of our observation, the Mission sought to determine the existence of the following pre-conditions for a credible referendum:

Constitutional and legal guarantees of freedoms and rights of citizens;
Conducive environment for free, fair and peaceful elections;
Timeous announcement of the referendum date;
Neutral location of the polling station;
Counting of the votes at the polling stations
During the launch of the SEOM, Observers were directed to adhere to the SADC Principles and Guidelines Governing Democratic Elections in the performance of their duties. Emphasis was placed on the following:

That the Observers must comply with the laws and regulations of the Republic of Zimbabwe and relevant international instruments governing democratic elections;


That they should maintain strict impartiality in the conduct of their duties, and shall at no time express any bias or preference in relation to national authorities, parties and organisations in the Constitutional Referendum;


That they will base all reports and conclusions on well documented, factual and verifiable evidence from a multiple number of credible sources as well as their own eye-witness accounts; and


That they should work harmoniously with each other and other election observation missions/organisations in their areas of deployment.
DEPLOYMENT OF SEOM OBSERVERS

Guided by the SADC Principles and Guidelines Governing Democratic Elections, the Mission deployed twelve (12) teams of observers across all ten (10) provinces of the Republic of Zimbabwe. Observers were given the responsibility to observe the Constitutional Referendum and to give comprehensive accounts of their findings in their areas of deployment in order for the Mission to provide an informed assessment.



The SEOM deployed seventy eight (78) observers drawn from various sectors of SADC Member States including Members of Parliament and civil society.



CONSULTATIONS WITH STAKEHOLDERS
In discharging its duties, the SEOM interacted with the relevant stakeholders in order to gather information on various aspects of the referendum. The stakeholders included inter alia:

Parties to the Global Political Agreement
Other political parties
Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP);
Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC);
The Constitutional Parliamentary Select Committee (COPAC);
Non-Governmental Organisations;
The European Union Diplomatic Mission and the Embassies of the USA, Australia, Canada and Norway;
The SADC Parliamentary Forum; and
Other Observer Missions
These interactions have assisted the SADC Election Observation Mission to understand the prevailing political environment in the country.

MAJOR ISSUES RAISED BY STAKEHOLDERS



The SEOM wishes to highlight some of the issues of concern expressed by some Stakeholders in the Constitutional Referendum. These include, inter alia, the following:

Timeous availability of resources to ZEC for preparation of the Referendum;
Concern about possible apathy;
Insufficient copies of the Draft Constitution distributed to the electorate;
Inadequate time allocated for the electorate to acquaint themselves with the Draft Constitution;
Inadequate time for some stakeholdersto conduct campaigns/civic education;
Non accreditation of some local Observers;
Poor signage and identification of some polling stations;
Inaccessibility of polling stations in some areas;
Polarised media
Isolated reports of intimidation and harassment


THE SEOM pursued some of these concerns in a systematic manner by conducting further investigations and at times sought clarification from relevant parties. Some of the responses provided regarding the abovementioned concerns were as follows:

On timeous availability of resources for preparation of the Referendum, the Mission gathered that ZEC had received the bulk of their funding just before the Referendum. However, the Mission observed that the funding challenge did not hamper the overall Referendum.


Regarding insufficient copies of the Draft Constitution distributed to the electorate; the Mission was informed by COPAC that 90,000 copies of the Draft Constitution, including audio and braille versions, were distributed across the country. Furthermore, the Mission learned that there were some existing mechanisms in place to access the Draft Constitution such as the COPAC website and regional offices.


With respect to inadequate time allocated for the electorate to acquaint themselves with the Draft Constitution; the Mission noted that the electorate had between (15th of February being the proclamation of the date of the Referendum to the 15thMarch 2013) to acquaint themselves with the Draft Constitution. The Mission observed that the Referendum took place within the provisions of the GPA Article 6 and the Referendum Act, Articles 3 and 4.


Regarding inaccessibility of polling stations in some areas; the Mission observed that due to inaccessibility of some areas, the transportation and distribution of polling materials as well as the polling officers was airlifted by ZEC.


The SEOM noted reports of isolated cases of intimidation and harassment in some areas and in particular in Mbare, Harare.  The SEOM condemn these acts of violence and pledge to law enforcement agents to objectively deal with these matters as they arise.
PRE-REFERENDUM PHASE



The Mission observed that the pre-referendum phase was characterized by a largely tolerant and peaceful civic atmosphere. In general, ZEC, COPAC and other relevant stakeholders conducted their work in a transparent, orderly and professional manner without any hindrance.

With regards to the eligibility of voters, the Mission noted that according to the Referendum Act, voters are not required to register for the Referendum and only those who are at least eighteen (18) years old and have a national ID card, waitingpass or valid passport can vote at any polling station across the country.

POLLING PROCESS



The Mission observed that most polling stations were opened by polling officers at the official time of 07:00 and closed at 19:00 in the presence of security and Observers. Furthermore, special arrangements were made for voters with special needs, such as priority queue for the elderly, expectant and/or nursing mothers and people with disabilities. The Mission observed the professional conduct of the polling staff.

COUNTING PROCESS



The Mission observed that the counting process began immediately after the closing of the polling stations. The counting process was conducted procedurally. Furthermore, procedures for secure counting of votes were adhered to. In addition, the Mission witnessed and followed closely the counting of votes together with the polling officers without any hindrance.

BEST DEMOCRATIC PRACTICES AND LESSONS LEARNT



In the course of observing the Referendum, the Mission noted that over and above, general adherence to the relevant national legal instruments and the SADC Principles and Guidelines Governing Democratic Elections. The following best democratic practices and lessons in the Zimbabwean Referendum were observed:

Provision of adequate logistical and material support by the ZEC to ensure that all citizens of voting age were able to participate in the referendum;
Prompt accreditation of Observers;
Provision of several polling streams that expedited the voting process;
Use of indelible ink to prevent double voting;
Use of translucent ballot boxes;
High state of preparedness by the Zimbabwe Republic Police, by providing adequate security that facilitated a peaceful environment for the Referendum;
SADC ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION RECOMMENDATIONS



Upon completion of the observation exercise, the Mission is pleased to share the following recommendations with the citizens and the stakeholders of the Republic of Zimbabwe:

Encourage the establishment of a mechanism through which funds for elections could be timely availed;
Encourage the update of the voters’ roll in time for elections;
Encourage continuous voter education;
CONCLUSION



The Mission is pleased to share its findings and observations with the people of Zimbabwe and all relevant stakeholders. In general, the Mission observed that the polling process was conducted in a peaceful, transparent and smooth manner.

The Mission has come to the conclusion that although some of the concerns raised are pertinent, they are, nevertheless, not of such magnitude as to affect the credibility of the overall Referendum.

We also wish to commend ZEC for the professional and dedicated manner in which they delivered a successful referendum to the people of Zimbabwe.

On behalf of the Chairperson of the Organ on Politics, Defence and Security Cooperation, His Excellency Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete, President of the United Republic of Tanzania and on behalf of the entire SADC family, I wish to sincerely congratulate the Government, ZEC and the people of Zimbabwe for holding a peaceful and credible Constitutional Referendum on 16 March 2013.

This is a major step in the implementation of the GPA and I therefore would like to take this opportunity to encourage the political leadership and all the people of Zimbabwe to uphold peace and stability.



Thank you very much.

The South African Government receives update on the case of Professor Cyril Karabus

In  the Portfolio Committee on International Relations today (20 March 2013) - I admitted that I was one of those people who did not understand, and was frustrated with the concept of 'quiet diplomacy'.  I'm still not sure how quiet we have to be but I do recognise the importance of diplomacy and I congratulated the deputy Minister and the department on progress made regarding Professor Karabus.  I also acknowledged that Zimbabwe with all its challenges is in a far better position, with a greater degree of democracy in place than countries to the North where blatant rather than subtle interventions were made from outside the country.

MEDIA STATEMENT
19 March 2013

The Department of International Relations and Cooperation wishes to announce that there has been a strategic breakthrough in the case of Prof Cyril Karabus.

Prof Karabus was found guilty in absentia in 2003 on charges of manslaughter and fraud, following the death of a three-year-old patient he was treating while doing locum work in Abu Dhabi. Prof Karabus was unaware of the charges and the sentence until he was arrested while transiting through Dubai in August 2012.

The Medical Review Committee that was set up to review the case against Prof Cyril Karabus met and it is understood that the Committee has absolved Prof Karabus from all blame for the death of his patient.

The Government of South Africa has since the beginning of this ordeal remained seized with this matter.  Over the past few months it has taken several actions to ensure a speedy resolution of the case. These include but are not limited to interaction between the Minister of International Relations and Co-operation and the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the UAE. Furthermore Mr Marius Fransman, the Deputy Minister of International Relations and Co-operation, travelled to Abu Dhabi and on 3 March 2013 and the most recent visit to Dubai on Sunday, on 17 March 2013 for engagements with the UAE authorities on the case. On the first occasion, he also met with Prof Karabus and his Legal team. The Deputy Minister also expressed South Africa’s concerns about the case to the UAE’s Minister of State during a discussion on the sidelines of the recent SADC Ministerial Meeting in Maputo on the 8th of March.

The South African Government’s concerns about the case centred around the rights of Prof Karabus to a speedy and fair trial, because the case was postponed on thirteen occasions due to the inability of the prosecution to present documentary evidence. There were also concerns over the health and age of Prof Karabus and we therefore called for a humanitarian approach in the finalisation of the matter.

We can confirm that the court met today and the report of the Medical Review Committee was presented to the court. Therefore we envisage that the court is expected to deliver its final verdict on Thursday, 21 March 2013. Deputy Minister Fransman spoke to Prof Karabus and his Legal team this morning this morning.

The South African Government is pleased that the Medical Committee has submitted its report to the court.

We call upon all South Africans to pray for the finalisation of the case and the safe and speedy return of Prof Karabus to South Africa.

As a democratic state, South Africa respects the sovereignty and the Independence of the Judicial System of the United Arab Emirates. We wish to thank the Government of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and in particular the Minister of Foreign Affairs, The Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Minister of State for the manner in which we have engaged on this matter
Enquiries: Mr Clayson Monyela, Spokesperson for the Department of International Relations and Cooperation, 082 884 5974

ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND COOPERATION

OR Tambo Building
460 Soutpansberg Road
Rietondale
Pretoria

Questions for Oral reply - President

20 MARCH 2013

PRESIDENT

In the National Assembly today during questions to the President, Cheryllyn Dudley MP ACDP said the following:

Mr President, the question I am asking is a serious question which I am not taking lightly – I know our history and I know the damage that was done!s gr

Is Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) and Affirmative Action (AA) solely for purposes of economic empowerment or is there an element of retribution – if so, do BEE and AA satisfy that need?

Should this important aspect - an often unacknowledged need for retribution – be researched and better understood in order to be responded to?

Response (my words):

The President responded at length, earnestly saying that BEE and AA were there to redress the past – they were not “against anyone” but for “those who were disadvantaged”. 

I know this President to be a man who generally does not dismiss things and it is my hope that he and others will give this issue some thought.

ACDP Speaks out against hate speech

MEDIA RELEASE

20 March 2013

ACDP SPEAKS OUT AGAINST HATE SPEECH

• strongly condemns anti-semitic nature of Israeli Apartheid Week

• horror of what happened to Matabele people in Zimbabwe - yet to be acknowledged

ACDP MP Cheryllyn Dudley said today:

“The ACDP notes that the week from 21 to 27 March, has been set aside to show solidarity with people struggling racism & racial discrimination and coincides with Human Rights Day.

Coming so close on the heels of the Israeli Apartheid Week organised at universities throughout the world the irony is not lost! Under the guise of solidarity with the people of Gaza, hate speech was condoned and applauded and anti-semitism was rife. 

The ACDP strongly condemns the anti-semitic nature of events that took place during this week at universities and other places as part of the inaccurately named Israeli Apartheid Week. We also find remarks by the Deputy Minister of International Relations and Co-operation, Marius Fransman, about Jewish businessmen in Cape Town to be divisive and inflammatory and extremely inappropriate for a person in his position.

The interests of all parties to any religious or national conflict are best served by a process of dialogue aimed at resolving differences and not a process that takes sides and drives parties further apart.”

It is over 60 years since the entire world stood up and said "Never Again"; never again to the genocide that saw millions of people – mainly Jewish people - killed because the Nazi regime found them racially or physically unacceptable, or just disagreed with their views. 

Since that Holocaust ended in 1945, there has been 46 genocides. 46 instances where masses of people have been exterminated! Close to home the horror of what happened to the Matabele people in Zimbabwe is yet to be even acknowledged – one genocide that the world has allowed to be ‘swept under the carpet’.

Racism & racial discrimination in all its forms are unacceptable and the ACDP welcomes Human Rights Day and the week to show solidarity with people struggling racism & racial discrimination as an opportunity to speak out against it."

ACDP encourages South Africans to switch-off during Earth Hour

MEDIA RELEASE
19th March 2013

The ACDP notes the significant importance of Earth Hour, a global initiative by the World Wildlife Fund, which takes place on Saturday, 23 March 2013.

Earth Hour is an annual international event where individuals, schools, organisations, businesses and governments turn off their lights for one hour to cast a vote in favor of action on climate change with a dedicated focus on creating awareness about climate change and the waste of our resources.

ACDP Member of Parliament, Cheryllyn Dudley, today invited all ACDP members and the whole of South Africa to participate in this worthy effort. Dudley suggests that we all collectively – and at the same time (8.30pm-9.30pm) on Saturday, switch off lights and appliances in our households in an effort to conserve electricity and acknowledge conservation efforts.

She says, “It may only be a small contribution, but it is a step in the right direction and a way to educate others. It is the responsibility of all of us - citizens, businesses and government to conserve this precious resource.

We welcome Earth Hour as an opportunity for South Africans to stand together in our efforts to create awareness and to conserve energy, recognising that our efforts should be consistent and continue long after 9:30pm on Saturday”.

The ACDP encourages everyone to turn off non-essential lighting and appliances during this hour.

Debate on Brics Durban Summit

DEBATE
Tues 19 March 2013
Cheryllyn Dudley MP - ACDP

Since South Africa's accession to the BRICS group of emerging powers in 2011, there has been sustained interest in South Africa's role in the grouping.

South Africa may be the small fish in the BRICS pond - compared to India or China - but BRICS represents rising powers from the different regions of the world and we do hold our own in Africa - although commentators say that ultimately the 'S' in BRICS should stand for SADC!

If we are able to align our region with our BRICS membership, it will represent a regional market of 273 million people, which gives greater credibility from a market size perspective and a far greater negotiating influence. With other nations being considered for membership, the acronym BRICS is expected to give way to 'E' for 'Emergent nations' and becoming the E6 or E8 – if this is so South Africa can only benefit from its early participation in the grouping.

Given that South Africa will be hosting the BRICS Summit next week in Durban, local players are hoping to see mining on the agenda as South Africa is a mining hub and this has not yet been prioritised even though all BRICS nations are heavily engaged in mining.
The ACDP would like to see BRICS discussion focusing on trade and investment barriers that inhibit business among participants - focusing on the barriers that matter and are relatively easy to deal with, such as visas and customs procedures etc.

BRICS needs to focus strongly on the facilitation of trade and use its leverage to cut trade and investment deals. We also think there is a need for BRICS partners to be raising awareness of opportunities in their respective business communities. Some of these countries are not renowned for operating business-friendly environments.
South Africa’s strength will depend on a team approach including government, the business community, think-tanks and civil society - the only way for South Africa to maximise the potential of BRICS. What we bring to the table as South Africa is however, the bottom line – if we do not bring finances and entrepreneurial skills we will not realise the potential there is for us in this BRICS partnership.
Economists warn that South Africa should not 'throw everything' into BRICS but continue to forge relationships elsewhere and in Africa.
BRICS is still very young and how it levers resources and opportunities will be watched closely - the proposed developmental bank which would finance infrastructure and sustainable-development projects across BRICS nations and other developing countries is an interesting example. The World Bank has welcomed the idea and is said to be looking for a strong working relationship - South African analysts caution that BRICS must ensure the bank is being established for the right reasons and not 'just to poke a finger in the World Bank's eye.
Private sector representatives, in the meantime, are hoping that BRICS might consider establishing a commercial bank, not only for development and infrastructure, but also for commercial projects - through which participants will be able to trade.
Lastly, the proposal to pool the foreign exchange reserves of the five BRICS member countries to support one another in times of balance of payments or currency crisis looks particularly interesting for South Africa. Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa collectively hold reserves of 4.5-trillion US dollars.

Mental Health Care Amendment Bill

MEDIA RELEASE

19 March 2013

Cheryllyn Dudley MP ACDP

The object of this Bill is to provide for the delegation of powers by the Director-General, to officials within the national department, to improve service delivery in the area of involuntary health care users and to ensure effective implementation of the Act generally. 

The proposed insertion enables the DG to delegate powers to review the mental health status of state patients, determine their transfers between health establishments and transfers from detention centres to health establishments in terms of a court order. The Bill also repeals a remaining chapter of the Act dealing with hospital boards that is no longer necessary.

The ACDP will support this bill which is not in itself contentious in any way and should improve efficiency and effectiveness. 

In October 2001 the ACDP also voted in favour of the then new Mental Health Care Act - legislation, aimed at ensuring appropriate care, treatment and rehabilitation services are available to people with mental-health problems. This legislation, with a primary health care approach, appeared to have practical relevance to everyday clinical decision-making and promoted greater transparency. 

Our concern at the time however, was that efforts to balance the rights of people with mental disabilities and the rights of the public were in question when it comes to state patients, with communities facing all the risk in terms of patient rehabilitation. 

I remember the trauma faced by my sister and her daughters when the man who murdered their son and brother did not have to stand trial as his use of drugs ensured that he was “not in his right mind” at the time of the murder, and this meant, in terms of the Act, he could be granted leave of absence or be discharged at any time without prior notice to the victims family. At the time this family believed they, and in fact, the whole community was in danger and lived with the worry that the man they knew to be a conman and murderer would be allowed back into the community without any warning. 

The ACDP moved amendments in the Portfolio committee, which would address these concerns, but in spite of broad support in the committee, including those who had actually worked with state mental patients and knew first-hand the deception often involved, was left out - even the minor concession with regard to leave of absence. 

As we have seen that when an accused can afford a top defence lawyer, the use of drugs can be a protection against even standing trial. We therefore, again call on the Minister and the department to seriously consider the need for the families of victims to be given the opportunity to appeal the leave of absence and discharge of state patients who pose a threat to society or at the very least be informed of such decisions.

ACDP questions maintenance on arrester beds after De Doorns bus accident

MEDIA RELEASE 

18 March 2013

The ACDP joins the people of South Africa in conveying our sincere condolences to families and friends of the 22 people, including two children, who had passed on in a tragic bus accident on Friday.

ACDP Representatives yesterday morning gathered in Site C, Khayelitsha, at a meeting to pray for the victims.

The ACDP today also welcomed the major investigation by Western Cape Transport MEC, Robin Carlisle, which has been launched into the cause of the accident.

According to a news report, “The bus reportedly veered off the N1 after brake failure and after it had gone through an arrester bed halfway down the pass”.

ACDP Member of Parliament, Cheryllyn Dudley, today said she would ask the Minister of Transport, Ben Martins, whether sufficient maintenance is carried out on arrester beds - which are used when vehicles have trouble stopping - at this accident hotspot and on other roads?

She added that: “This is an unfortunate incident. Our heartfelt and sincere condolences go to the families of the deceased and we wish a speedy recovery to all who were injured. We also urge people to be vigilant, extra cautious and to obey all the rules of the road at all times, especially as the holidays over the next few weeks will increase the traffic on our roads”.

A memorial service is planned for the victims on Thursday in Khayelitsha.

The accident comes nearly three years after a similar incident on the same stretch of the road claimed the lives of 23 people. 

President Peres congratulates the new Pope and invites him to visit Israel

President Shimon Peres, today (Thursday, 14 March 2013), at his Jerusalem residence, during a meeting with the leaders of the Catholic Church in Poland, welcomed the new Pope. President Peres said, "The newly elected Pope represents devotion, the love of God, the love of peace, a holy modesty and a new continent which is now awakening. We need, more than ever, a spiritual leadership and not just a political one. Where political leaders may divide, spiritual leaders may unite. Unite around a vision, unite around values, unite around a faith that we can make the world a better place to live. May the Lord Bless the new Pope."

President Peres invited the new Pope to visit Israel and said, "I would like to take this opportunity to invite the newly elected Pope to pay a visit to the Holy Land at the earliest possibility. He'll be a welcome guest in the Holy Land, as a man of inspiration that can add to the attempt to bring peace in a stormy area. All people here, without exception, without difference of religion or nationality will welcome the newly elected Pope."

Addressing relations with the Vatican President Peres said, "The relations between the Vatican and the Jewish people are now at their best in the last 2000 years and I hope they will grow in content and depths."

President Peres also spoke about the outgoing Pope and said, "I have much respect for the resigned Pope, Benedict, I found him a dear friend of our people, a profound thinker and he really contributed so much to bringing together, historically and otherwise, the relations between the Catholic Church and the Jewish people. I'm sure that the new Pope, Francis, will continue. He will remind all of us , as a shepherd of our time, that the Lord loves the poor not only the mighty, that the Lord calls us to peace not for hatred, that the Lord calls us to serve each other, to build a world where people are together without hatred."

ACDP congratulates new Pope of Roman Catholic Church

The ACDP wishes to congratulate Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio as the new Pope Francis I of the Roman Catholic Church, and the first Latin American to assume office of such stature in the Catholic faith.

With a rise in secular humanism across the globe, and the steady decline in morals, norms and values, encapsulated in the Bible, it is heartening to note that Pope Francis has a readiness to challenge powerful interest groups. An example of this is seen when in 2010, he challenged the Argentine government when it backed a gay marriage bill. He is quoted as saying, “Let’s not be naïve. This isn’t a simple political fight, it’s an attempt to destroy God’s plan.”

The ACDP believes that such men, are a rare, as many bow to the whims and dictates of the politically correct in today’s society, not having the courage of their convictions to challenge the gross moral and social inequalities in society which are perpetrated by the few who occupy positions of power.

The ACDP shares the view of Pope Francis, that “the Church should have a missionary role, that gets out to meet people, and that is active.”

Once again, the ACDP expresses its congratulations and best wishes to Pope Francis to what is an important and influential spiritual position for Christians, particularly, those of the Catholic Church.

Notice of Motion - Mining

NOTICE OF MOTION

Cheryllyn Dudley MP - ACDP                                                               

13 March 2013

On behalf of the African Christian Democratic Party I give notice that I shall move that the house debates:

The need for a sustainable foundation for mining and a commitment to creating an environment of: policy certainty, transparent fair regulatory systems and higher quality physical and social infrastructure, to enable investors to commit long-term resources.

Has Budget 2013 attended to the needs of our children?

Government has been clear in stating that it is aiming for sustainability and that ‘today’s spending’ must not be at the expense of future generations.  Government intends simply to “do more with less”.   Our deficit must be reduced and therefore we must spend less they say.

Organisations working with children are acutely aware that more funding is needed even to maintain the gains made let alone increase services.

As government plans to increase services it also intends providing no extra money and a ‘quality crisis’ is expected.  Departments which are already struggling are being asked to do more with less.  Tragically if the departments fail to deliver – and this is very possible - the impact on children is expected to be cruel!

The conservative monetary measures taken by the Finance Minister make sense on many levels as we aim to be responsible – however we are choosing quantity over quality at great risk.

The questions being asked are:

 “Is this the right time to be stripping South Africa of its ‘entitlement culture’?

“Are we ready for this way of doing things”?

“Will the cost be too great – especially where children are concerned”?

The general feeling is that there is no evidence of any qualitative shift in government thinking with regard to children and family – and that the 2013 Budget is a brave attempt at muddling through!!

Notice of Motion - ACDP calls for a debate on risk assessment procedures of Dept of Agriculture and review of study on GM maize

Notice of a Motion
Cheryllyn Dudley, MP
12 March 2013


ACDP calls for a debate on risk assessment procedures of Dept of Agriculture and review of study on GM maize

ACDP chief whip and MP, Cheryllyn Dudley,  today called on the National Assembly to debate:

The risk assessment procedures of South Africa's Department of Agriculture and the possible need for an official review of a long term study that reveals genetically modified maize could cause cancer and negatively impact on liver and kidney functions.

Comment on Cyril Ramaphosas recent address to a church

IN RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR ME TO COMMENT ON DEPUTY PRESIDENT OF THE ANC, CYRIL RAMAPHOSA'S RECENT ADDRESS TO A CHURCH - "You do your job and I'll do mine" is not a bad motto for nation building! The ANC like the DA are masters at courting the church at election time and christians are taught to believe the best in others so in general bridges are mended and old allegiances stand! 

We have to concerntrate on being and presenting ourselves as serious politicians capable of making rational decisions that will take us forward and not backward - decisions that will not exclude or disadvantage sections of the population. We need to present to South Africa a leadership they can have confidence in - this will take time and we must be prepared to go the distance.

We must also be prepared to work within the constraints of politics which unlike the church involves a degree of compromise in order to allow people of different persuasions the choice to decide how they will live. I agree that christians have an important role to play in raising the moral standard unfortunately I don't think this will be accomplished as much through the spoken word as it will be in living out what we believe - that too, takes time to make an impact!

From unrelenting growth to purposeful development “buen vivir”: New approaches, new solutions

Cheryllyn Dudley MP ACDP             

National Assembly Debate

Tues 12 March 2013

The Inter-Parliamentary Union’s 128th Assembly will take place in Quito, (Ecuador), from 22 to 27 March 2013. The overall theme of the general debate is: From unrelenting growth to purposeful development “Buen Vivir”, New Approaches, new solutions.

From unrelenting growth to purposeful development - "Buen Vivir," translated 'good living' – in this context, is an alternative concept of development.  It is - living in harmony with other people and with nature and eliminates the separation between nature and society.

One area where South Africa has seemed ‘hell-bent’ on growth while determined, despite considerable risk, to ignore the concerns of people - is genetic modification.  Genetically Modified Organisms have produced unrelenting growth and we have witnessed technological leaps forward in many fields, from mosquito 'de-arming' to the new GM flu vaccine.  Many scientists however, question the wisdom of taking risks where GM foodstuffs are concerned.  

Inadequate risk assessment and approval procedures in South Africa are fuelling concerns that long term health impacts for people who eat maize every day could be seriously problematic.  The particular maize in question is Monsanto's Round-up Ready Maize NK603 which constitutes 40% - nearly half of South Africa's maize crop.  My understanding is that no other government has allowed its staple food to be genetically modified and the ACDP has called on government to examine relevant findings.  The ACDP has also called for a debate on this subject, which has implications for other GMOs on the market. 

It is widely acknowledged that the safety data prepared by the manufacturer, on which our government based its approval, is nowhere near as robust as the new French study, recently published, which shows it could be seriously hazardous. The usual 3-month tests show no risk but the peer reviewed and applauded French study showed significant development of cancerous tumours after four months. When carried out over the full lifespan of rats, tests showed disturbingly high mortality rates and severe impacts on kidney and liver functioning. In addition to this, the pesticide that is always paired with this GM maize called glyphosate, also marketed by Monsanto, showed impacts on liver, kidneys and mammary gland functioning. 

The ACDP, in response to concerns raised by the African Centre for Biosafety and others, has been calling for an immediate ban on the import and cultivation of this GMO maize. Our GMO law, and the international law, is based on the Precautionary Principle; "when there is possibility of harm all activities must be stopped, even in the face of scientific uncertainty". 

Our staple food is being compromised by GMO’s and government’s lack of response is very disturbing.  

The ACDP supports the concept of moving from unrelenting growth to purposeful and safe development, new approaches and new solutions which is the subject of this IPU debate.

Response to Questionnaire - Teen pregnancy, condoms and drugs

Below are my comments to another student doing a project at school.

Comments by: Cheryllyn Dudley MP ACDP

The African Christian Democratic Party has raised concerns that Health Minister Motsoaledi’s recent call for condoms to be distributed in schools will not solve problems and will in fact exacerbate them by encouraging underage sexual activity.

The ACDP believes it is very important to delay sexual activity for as long as possible and that it is not acceptable for government to hand out condoms to children because it sends a message which condones and encourages early sexual activity.  This strips young people of important reasons for protecting themselves and abstaining from sexual experimentation.  Young people are vulnerable to peer and other pressure and need all the help they can get not to give in to it.

Young people who have managed to significantly delay sexual activity, tell us they managed simply because they did not give themselves an option.  The experience of other countries indicates that condom distribution encourages a culture of casual sex and risky sexual behaviour.

The National Association of People Living with HIV and AIDS refer to teenage pregnancy as if eliminating the inconvenience of a baby would make it ok to ignore the real problems of teachers and “sugar-daddys”  taking advantage of - and abusing young girls.  This also ignores the fact that some girls get pregnant because they want to - for various reasons.  Pregnancy in School has become an accepted practice and no amount of condoms would dissuade these girls.

Distribution of condoms at schools puts young people who may have thought better of becoming sexually active at risk of giving in to the pressure – largely because they now have fewer reasons to draw on for saying NO!

Few people would argue with the fact that it is important for young people to delay sexual activity for as long as possible – allowing for children to be children – free of the emotional struggles and turmoil that come with being physically intimate without the security of marriage.
Early sexual activity and teen pregnancy are not what we want for our children but this will continue to be the situation if we persist in throwing condoms at the problems.  If we want a different reality it will require real work:
- Addressing poverty
- Changing mindsets
- Building young people’s self esteem
- Awareness campaigns and day to day mentoring and teaching on valuing oneself and making choices that result in positive outcomes in life – the childs life, their childrens lives and generations to come
- Teaching children from very little not to let people touch their private parts and to tell an adult they trust if someone does
Giving up on our children is not helpful – the reality we face is daunting but our children are worth the effort.  Of course we can never protect every child from this experience but we can try – and the investment in their lives will be worth it in other ways as well.
We need more counsellors in schools to advise, guide and help young people stay strong in valuing themselves and their futures - also helping young people who have made risky choices and are reaping negative consequences.
What we are actually facing - but not even attempting to deal with is ‘statutory rape’ – older people taking advantage of children who are vulnerable due to lack, need and emotional immaturity.   Condoms are the easy way out for parents and politicians and do not address the problem.  Our children deserve more.

“Human rights are valueless if we fail to value human life.

The suggestion that abortion on demand will stop illegal abortions is being used to pressurise countries, particularly in Africa, into passing abortion laws that have absolutely no regard for human life yet the truth is plain to see...legal abortion increases and illegal ones continue as they did before.  Baby deaths in general increase as well if South Africa is anything to go by.  Arguments that abortion must be legal because it will happen anyway are indefensible.

Many of the arguments for abortion were used in defending slavery centuries ago.  Abuse of every kind is unlikely to ever be eradicated yet it cannot be condoned.   We must do everything possible to protect every child... those who are wanted and those who are said to be unwanted, those whose parents can afford them and those who can't.

While well meaning people...and those with their own agenda’s speak up for what they call women’s rights, legalising abortion on demand denies helpless babies even the right to life.

The ACDP would like to see Abortion legislation at the very least, ensuring informed choice.  Presently legislation does not protect women who should receive comprehensive counselling.  To enable a mother to give fully informed consent for any termination of her pregnancy she must have access to a scan showing the developing baby inside her and must be able to fully consider both the extent of the risks involved in continuing the pregnancy and the risks involved in terminating the pregnancy, the risk of breast cancer, depression, future difficulties in conceiving and bearing children and available alternatives to abortion including adoption and state or other support that is available.

The ACDP’s plan to better the standard of learning in public schools

I was recently asked to help a student with a school project by answering the following questions.

Reply to Questions from NB via DK
By Cheryllyn Dudley MP ACDP – 7March 2013

The enormous amount of effort and money being invested in our basic education system must, for the sake of everyone living in South Africa, result in a significant improvement in both quantity and quality of school learners at all levels.

Concerns have been raised that low standards are sending a "wrong message" to pupils, parents, universities and employers, and undermine transformation of both the basic and higher education systems.  To earn a matric certificate, pupils need to pass two out of six subjects with 30%, and four with 40% - under apartheid a 33% average was needed - so an increase in the minimum pass for matric would deviate from many years of tradition.
Changes would clearly create huge challenges for the department and for learners and teachers even if implemented cautiously and progressively.

Schools that perform poorly carry a debilitating legacy from our past that the combined efforts of government and society have to date, not been able to reverse.  Quality education requires at the very least, both quality teachers and quality textbooks.  The ACDP would like to see an increased emphasis on improving teaching skills and content knowledge.  The large percentage of teachers in the final grades of school who do not have enough subject matter knowledge or knowledge of teaching to prepare students adequately for final examinations is unacceptable. We would also like to see measures being taken to benchmark the quality of teachers and to promote job fulfilment.
Before a student can pass exams like the National Senior Certificate they first need to be taught good study techniques – the ability to read and comprehend, the ability to take meaningful notes and how to manage their time. These are areas where learners fall short, especially when entering Higher Education Institutions –minds are impressionable when young and if taught that “learning the memo”– marking model answers prepared by Departments - will be sufficient to pass then they lose the passion and knack for real and life-long learning.  This aspect must be a budget priority as it will determine much of the success and failure to come in the years ahead.

The ACDP will ensure the school curriculum and activities are adequately incorporating ethics and leadership training to assist learners to be, not only competent in their profession, but also trustworthy, honest and able to work with other people.

There is a need for improved internet connectivity and eLearning, particularly in rural areas.  The ACDP will establish ICT laboratories in schools. We will budget for computer laboratory upgrades and maintenance, and for teachers with the skills to teach information technology and computer application technology.

The ACDP will hold Provinces accountable to the Norms and Standards for school infrastructure etc and ensure that provinces spend money more effectively.  We recognise that transport and school nutrition are critical factors in ensuring education is accessible to all, especially those less privileged.

The ACDP is mindful that time and workload pressures on both teachers and parents are great but interaction between teachers and parents must be prioritised as it significantly influences the development of learners.

The ACDP regards the disruption of learners’ studies by union activities as a crisis which significantly impacts on the ability of all learners to fulfil their potential as leaders of tomorrow. We are committed to holding unions accountable to finding new and more helpful ways of dealing with grievances and wage demands.
.
The ACDP will prioritise teaching of learning skills which could be incorporated in Life Orientation and introduced to learners in Grade 10 and upwards at the very least. An investigation conducted at several schools in Johannesburg and Pretoria attributed the high failure rate of learners and factors affecting retention and drop-out rates to the fact that learners struggle because they do not know:

•         How to read and memorize
•         How to learn
•         How to prepare for tests and exams
•         How to write for exam papers
•         How to do assignments
•         How to handle stress during exams
•         How to plan their time wisely when writing exams
•         How to become self-motivated

The ACDP will ensure that Early Childhood Development is available at all schools and in all areas, and hold Provinces accountable to legislation requiring them to prioritise spending on ECD in poorer areas.  We would ensure that the budget adequately accommodates ECD needs including ensuring access to quality ECD teacher training and the marketing of ECD teaching as a viable career option.